Meta has announced the expansion of its Fraud Intelligence Reciprocal Exchange (FIRE), a collaborative information-sharing initiative designed to combat fraud.
Through this program, banks can share intelligence directly with Meta, which the tech giant can then use to identify and take down scam accounts on its platforms.
This initiative marks a step forward in the fight against online fraud, but critics, including Revolut, argue that Meta needs to take more responsibility for the scams that originate on its platforms.
Expanding the FIRE Program
The FIRE initiative first launched as a pilot with UK banks NatWest and Metro Bank, facilitating the sharing of critical information about fraudulent activities between financial institutions and Meta.
This collaboration, which lasted six months, proved successful in taking down around 20,000 scam accounts across 185 shared URLs, including a major scam network selling fake concert tickets in the UK and US.
Meta’s Global Head of Counter-Fraud, Nathaniel Gleicher, emphasised the importance of this cross-industry collaboration, stating: “We will only beat these criminals if we work together and share relevant information related to scams.”
According to Gleicher, the intelligence shared by banks allows Meta to train its systems to detect and act against scams more effectively.
This success has prompted Meta to expand the program, with more banks set to join in the coming months.
The partnership has been welcomed by the banking industry, as well as regulatory bodies like the City of London Police and the National Economic Crime Centre.
David Lindberg, CEO of Retail Banking at NatWest, expressed optimism about the collaboration, saying, “Spotting and stopping fraudsters before they are able to target customers is the best way to address this growing problem. Partnering with Meta is an important step in tackling the epidemic of fraud.”
A Growing Problem, but Is It Enough?
While Meta’s FIRE program shows promise in fighting online fraud, critics argue that the initiative does not go far enough.
Revolut has seen significant fraud activity stemming from social media platforms, including Facebook and WhatsApp, believes Meta should take more responsibility for preventing scams and reimbursing victims.
“A commitment to data sharing, albeit needed, simply isn’t good enough. Social media platforms not only continue to enable fraud… the issue is just as bad today as it was last year,” said Woody Malouf, Revolut’s Head of Financial Crime, criticising Meta’s approach.
Revolut’s data, which covers much of the EU, UK, Norway, and Switzerland, paints a grim picture.
Purchase scams, where fake ads lead users to bogus websites that never deliver the promised goods, remain the most common type of fraud.
Additionally, job scams, where fraudsters post fake job vacancies and request upfront payments for training or administration costs, have surged to account for 18% of all reported scams.
Revolut and other critics argue that while Meta’s data-sharing efforts are a positive step, they do not address the core issue: social media platforms are still being used as breeding grounds for fraudulent activity.
Calls for Stronger Accountability
In Brussels, Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) are pushing for social media companies to bear more responsibility for the fraudulent ads that appear on their platforms.
Proposed amendments to the EU’s Payment Services Directive (PSD) would hold platforms accountable for scams that involve fraudulent requests for money, whether the scammers are posing as a family member, a bank, or a government agency.
Revolut has echoed these sentiments, arguing that social media companies like Meta should go beyond removing scam accounts and start sharing in the burden of reimbursing victims of fraud, especially when these scams generate profit for the platforms through paid ads.
Meta’s Role in the Fight Against Fraud
Meta, for its part, insists that it is committed to combating fraud through initiatives like the FIRE program and improved threat detection systems.
The company acknowledges the ongoing challenge and has said it is working to make its platforms safer for users.
Gleicher, Meta’s counter-fraud lead, highlighted the importance of collaboration with financial institutions, stating that the data shared by banks helps train Meta’s systems to “take action against more scams globally.”
The company also stresses that the expansion of the FIRE program will allow for more banks to participate, leading to increased intelligence sharing and, hopefully, even greater success in rooting out fraudulent activity.
The expansion of the FIRE program is a step forward, but with scams continuing to proliferate, the fight against online fraud is far from over.
The post Meta expands FIRE fraud partnership – critics say more needed appeared first on Payments Cards & Mobile.